REAGAN AS DEMAGOD OR PROTO-TYPE of ANTI-CHRIST?—Let’s Ask Chomsky!
By Kevin Stoda
Well, somewhere (probably Mudville) people are celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Ronald Reagan.
The Lord knows why!
Reagan was certainly the main prototype of the George W. Bush (Run Up Debt and Crash the Economy) Administration and the current newly elected and re-elected Republican Spin Doctors in the USA. Many around-the-world forget that Reagan left office as the least popular USA president since “Tricky Dick” Nixon, who resigned in disgrace in 1974.
Dr. Noam Chomsky recently reviewed the “deification” in recent years of Ronald Reagan for DEMOCRACY NOW TV.
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/2/17/democracy_uprising_in_the_usa_noam
First, Chomsky pointed out Reagan’s ferocious attacks on labor and fair-wages-for the average and poorest working men and women in America. Chomsky related, “There has been a huge attack against private sector unions. Actually, that’s been going on since the Second World War. After the Second World War, business was terrified about the radicalization of the country during the Depression and then the war, and it started right off—Taft-Hartley was 1947—huge propaganda campaigns to demonize unions. It really—and it continued until you get to the Reagan administration.”
Most importantly, “Reagan was extreme. Beginning of his administration, one of the first things was to call in scabs—hadn’t been done for a long time, and it’s illegal in most countries—in the air controller strike. Reagan essentially—by “Reagan,” I mean his administration; I don’t know what he knew—but they basically told the business world that they’re not going to apply the labor laws. So, that means you can break unions any way you like. And in fact, the number of firing of union organizers, illegal firing, I think probably tripled during the Reagan years.”
The reason we do not know if Reagan always knew about much that was going on around the white house was that Reagan took long naps and developed Alzheimer’s during his term in office. It is quite clear that people, like George Herbert Walker Bush, thought they were in charge throughout the 1980s. (Some claim that Nancy Reagan ran the White House.)
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/white_house/jan-june11/nancyreagan_02-04.html
THE MYTHS AND DEIFICATION OF REAGAN
Noam Chomsky lists numerous myths and shortcomings of the Ronald Reagan Era—an Era that damaged America economically, spiritually, and socio-politically. First, Chomsky reflects, “This deification of Reagan is extremely interesting and a very—it’s scandalous, but it tells a lot about the country. I mean, when Reagan left office, he was the most unpopular living president, apart from Nixon, even below Carter. If you look at his years in office, he was not particularly popular. He was more or less average. He severely harmed the American economy. When he came into office, the United States was the world’s leading creditor. By the time he left, it was the world’s leading debtor. He was fiscally totally irresponsible—wild spending, no fiscal responsibility. Government actually grew during the Reagan years.”
Despite the wild-spending of the Reagan Administration, “He [Reagan] was . . . a passionate opponent of the free market. I mean, the way he’s being presented [in the 2011 press and media] is astonishing. He was the most protectionist president in post-war American history. He essentially virtually doubled protective barriers to try to preserve incompetent U.S. management, which was being driven out by superior Japanese production.”
Chomsky added, “During his years [as President] , we had the first major fiscal crises. During the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s, the New Deal regulations were still in effect, and that prevented financial crises. The financialization of the economy began to take off in the ’70s, but with the deregulation, of course you start getting crises. Reagan left office with the biggest financial crisis since the Depression: the home savings and loan.”
Lacking time in this Democracy Now interview to more fully critique the “abominable” international relations debacles carried out by the Ronald Reagan administration, Chomsky just noted, “I mean, if we gained our optimism by killing hundreds of thousands of people in Central America and destroying any hope for democracy and freedom and supporting South Africa while it killed about a million-and-a-half people in neighboring countries, and on and on, if that’s the way we get back our optimism, we’re in bad trouble.”
Chomsky concluded his critique of the cultural memory of Ronald Reagan being promoted by today’s media by likening the deification of Reagan to the deification of North Korean leaders, such as Kim Il-sung.
MY SPIN ON REAGAN ERA
I personally remember living through the Reagan Era in the USA and abroad. It was a depressing eight years.
In many ways, most American ideals of ourselves were simply washed down the drain in the 1980s. For example, the dream of bringing any war criminals to trial was nixed by Ronald Reagan when the USA recused itself from such courts in the Netherlands after quietly laying land mines (against the U.S. Congress’ orders) off the coast of Nicaragua.
The Reagan administration made a disaster of our long term social-economic interests. He created humongous divisions in wealth and built a nation of Gordon Geckos who have only grown more untouchable as the decades go by.
The Reagan administration secretly allied itself with Iraq in its decade-long war with Iran—making Saddam Hussein our bosom buddy in the region.
Please, tell your children and grandchildren the truth about the Ronald Reagan administration and its boondoggles—from the savings in loan scandals to allowing Sharon to make war on Lebanon. Such were the precedents of RR.
THIS IMPORTANT CRITIQUE OF BECK & FOX NEWS COMES FROM MEDIA MATTERS
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102170056
Beck Ties Islam To The Antichrist
February 17, 2011 8:48 pm ET by Adam Shah
On today’s edition of his Fox News show, Glenn Beck tied Islam to the Antichrist described in the New Testament. He even had a side-by-side comparison of the Antichrist and the “12th Imam” or “Mahdi” (terms Beck uses interchangeably to describe the figure many Muslims believe will guide believers in the end times) on his chalkboard.
And to help Beck discuss this connection, Beck hosted Joel Richardson, an anti-Muslim activist who says that Satan will use Islam “to fulfill the prophesies of the Bible” and has written a column headlined “What Obama and the Antichrist have in common.”
Here’s Beck’s chalkboard:
Although Beck says during the show that only a minority of Muslims have beliefs that should scare you, Richardson makes no such disclaimer. Rather, Richardson suggests that all Muslims (or at least all orthodox Muslims) desire the return of the Antichrist. Here are a couple of things he said:
•”You have the bad guy of the Bible. He primarily persecutes God’s people, the Jews and the Christians. … [The imam] likewise causes Jews and Christians either to submit to Islam or be killed. … It’s abundantly found throughout the Islamic sacred traditions known as the Hadith.”
•”According to the Bible, the mark of the beast is a mark that is put on the foreheads that essentially condemns someone to hell. On the Islamic side, the Muslims have picked up on this tradition, except in Islamic tradition, the beast is a good guy, and he marks the foreheads of all true Muslims, and so, in essence, Muslims are desiring that they would receive the mark of the beast.”
•”On the biblical side, Jesus returns to deliver his people from having been defeated and crushed, persecuted. On the Islamic side, the Muslim Jesus returns and tells the Christians of the world, you’ve had it wrong all along. Your Bible is corrupt. I never claimed to be the son of God. I never died on the cross. Islam is the true religion. Follow the Mahdi or die.”
•”Most orthodox Muslims would say that this is sacred scripture that you cannot discard.”
One more point: During the segment Beck also hosted Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim. Jasser said that “The Quran talks about a few signs of the end of times, but most of the details you gave are from the Hadith,” the oral sayings and deeds of Muhammad that are treated as holy by Muslims. Jasser continued: “Reform is I think going to happen in Islam when we start to discard parts of the Hadith that are not legitimate, that have been fabricated. And this is where there is some disagreement. So some of these stories come out of, I think, illegitimate Hadith, but others may be legitimate.”
This is where Richardson states: “Most orthodox Muslims would say that this is sacred scripture that you cannot discard. He’s essentially saying that it’s discardible.” So, Richardson is basically telling Jasser (a Muslim) that the more peaceful view of Islam is un-orthodox and that traditional Muslims hope to be united under the rule of the Antichrist who will kill Jews, Christians and nonbelievers. And Beck has given him a platform on national television.
http://eslkevin.wordpress.com/2012/02/05/teach-in-how-can-we-cut-the-u-s-military-spending-and-bad-dependencies/#comment-6344