Dear Kevin,
History was made at the United Nations Thursday. For the first time in its 71 years, the global body voted to begin negotiations on a treaty to ban nuclear weapons. Eight nations with nuclear arms (the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, and Israel) opposed or abstained from the resolution, while North Korea voted yes. However, with a vote of 123 for, 38 against and 16 abstaining, the First Committee decided “to convene in 2017 a United Nations conference to negotiate a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total elimination.” Every president since Harry Truman has sought the elimination of nuclear weapons. Ronald Reagan famously said in his 1984 State of the Union: “A nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. The only value in our two nations possessing nuclear weapons is to make sure they will never be used. But then would it not be better to do away with them entirely?” Today, there is a new growing global movement that reflects widespread fears that the world is moving closer to a nuclear catastrophe — and that the nuclear-armed powers are not serious about reducing these risks or their arsenals. If anything, these states — with the United States and Russia leading the way — are increasing the danger by pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into new Cold War nuclear weapons programs. I am engaged in real, honest debates among nuclear security experts on the pros and cons of this ban treaty. Does it really matter if a hundred-plus countries sign a treaty to ban nuclear weapons but none of the countries with nuclear weapons join? Will this be a serious distraction from the hard work of stopping new, dangerous weapons systems, cutting nuclear budgets, or ratifying the nuclear test ban treaty? I urge you to read my full article explaining the importance of this historic moment — and what it means for our future safety and security. Thank you for your continued support. We and all our talented grantees are working hard to explore all strategies to reduce nuclear threats, cut dangerous weapons systems, and secure the ratification of the nuclear ban treaty. Together, we will find the solutions.
|
|||
|
Timeline of nuclear weapons development – Wikipedia
This timeline of nuclear weapons development is a chronological catalog of the evolution of …. See also[edit]. History of Nuclear Weapons · Nuclear Weapons · Nuclear Fission · Nuclear Fusion. Retrieved from …

Nuclear Weapons Facts, Nuclear Weapons Testing Timeline History
Read about nuclear weapons history from the first atomic bomb/nuclear bomb test & learn nuclear weapons facts. Help The ATOM Project end nuclear tests.
History of Nuclear Weapons timeline | Timetoast timelines
History of Nuclear Weapons, a timeline made with Timetoast’s free interactive timeline making software.
Nuclear Detonation Timeline “1945-1998” – YouTube
The 2053 nuclear tests and explosions that took place between 1945 and … the Manhattan Project and the two …
Timeline of the Nuclear Age [1940s] | atomicarchive.com
This comprehensive timeline traces the nuclear age, from the discovery of x-rays in … Topics also include radioactivity and the explosion of the first atomic bomb.

Timeline of the Nuclear Age [1950s] | atomicarchive.com
This comprehensive timeline traces the nuclear age, from the discovery of x-rays in … Topics also include radioactivity and the explosion of the first atomic bomb.
Timeline on North Korea’s Nuclear Program – The New York Times
Nov 20, 2014 – The country’s nuclear weapons program and its development of … In one of the strangest sights in the history of accidental American diplomacy, …

This Is When The World’s Nations Got Their Nuclear Weapons …
Apr 1, 2015 – … weapons is clear enough to have changed the course of history and … a timeline of when the world’s powers got their own nuclear weapons:.
Nuclear Weapons Timeline – SoftSchools
The weapons were put to devastating use in Japan, but after the war, the U.S. and … Major powers gradually reversed nuclear proliferation, but to this day some …
