Roberts is Right? The Military-Industrial-Surveillance State should be Amnesty Internationals Focus on the USA–all progressives should follow this advice

Amnesty International Is Barking Up The Wrong Tree

By Paul Craig Roberts

Why doesn’t Amnesty International address the reckless and irresponsible acts of the US government that are violating the rights of people in numerous countries and pushing the world into nuclear war? Instead, there have been times when Amnesty International aligns with Washington’s propaganda against Washington’s victims.


I have received a letter from Margaret Huang, Amnesty International’s executive director. She is fundraising on the basis of President Trump’s “chilling disregard for our cherished human rights” and his exploitation of “hFrom Paul Craig Roberts Website

3 Degrees of Separation from the Military-Industrial-Prison-Data ……/3-degrees-of-separation-from-the-military-industrial-prison-data-surveillance…

Mar 8, 2015 – 3 Degrees of Separation from the MilitaryIndustrial-Prison-Data-Surveillance State. Some time ago, I started searching LinkedIn for keywords like “ interrogation” and “surveillance”. My initial thought was that I would find private organizations with ties to law enforcement and the military. I was surprised to …

The Military-Industrial Complex’s Secret War for Our Data – Medium

Jul 6, 2017 – This piece was written by Edin Omanovic, who leads PI’s state surveillance program. War profiteers are finding the data business easy going. The have wielded their unwarranted influence and applied their business model of causing and then profiting from insecurity and applied it to the digital age; the …

A madman has been given the keys to the surveillance state / Boing …

Nov 9, 2016 – Then, eight years of Obama operationalized that surveillance state, gave it the competent administrators and diverse stakeholders — local police, international partners, militaryindustrial contractors with fat lobbying budgets — that it needs to sustain itself indefinitely. Now, a madman has been given control …

The Intelligence-Industrial Complex | HuffPost

Jun 20, 2013 – “…we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex . … sight of the greatest question: Is the Surveillance State — the intelligence-industrial complex — out of the control of the elected officials responsible for holding it accountable …

A virtual secret state: the military-industrial complex 2.0 | Barrett Brown … › US News › US national security

Oct 9, 2011 – Barrett Brown: US reliance on private contractors is seeing a sinister focus on surveillance of citizens instead of defence against cyber attack.

The Security-Industrial Complex – The Atlantic

Jun 15, 2013 – No one — except a handful of elected officials and an army of contractors — is allowed to know how America’s surveillance leviathan works. For the last two … have tried to describe to the American public the sweeping surveillance the National Security Agency conducts inside and outside the United States.

A Trillion Ways To Build a New Military-Industrial Complex …

Oct 11, 2014 – Yet the latest iteration of the military industrial complex, exemplified by the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, seems only to have produced … the U.S. needs to critically re-evaluate the unchecked expansion of the War on Terror and its propagation of an all-encompassing surveillance state.

New World Order Technocrats and the Surveillance State …

Jul 4, 2011 – War leads to the erosion of liberty for the benefit of the militaryindustrial complex. World War II set in motion the destruction of privacy and the formation of an Orwellian Police State controlled by the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States of America. Under the guise of cooperation and mutual …

Obama’s NSA Speech: Just What Eisenhower Warned About? : The …

Jan 16, 2014 – VIDEO: On Jan. 17, 1961, Ike spoke to the nation about a militaryindustrial complex. He said “an alert and knowledgeable citizenry” must help safeguard security and liberty. Friday, exactly 53 years later, Obama will speak about surveillance programs that critics say threaten civil liberties.

Obama’s NSA speech: 53 years after Ike’s warning – USA Today

Jan 16, 2014 – Obama gives a speech Friday on possible changes to NSA surveillance rules. More than 50 years ago, Eisenhower — who had led Allied forces to victory in Europe during World War II — cited the United States‘ rise as a world power, including a massive standing army and thriving weapons businesses:.

atred, misogyny, racism and xenophobia,” by which he has “emboldened and empowered the most violent segments of our society.”

Considering the hostility of Identity Politics toward Trump, one can understand why Ms. Huang frames her fundraiser in this way, but are the Trump deplorables the most empowered and violent segments of our society or is it the security agencies, the police, the neoconservatives, the presstitute media, and the Republican and Democratic parties?

John Kiriakou, Ray McGovern, Philip Giraldi, Edward Snowden, and others inform us that it is their former employers, the security agencies, that are empowered by unaccountability and violent by intent. Certainly the security agencies are emboldened by everything they have gotten away with, including their conspiracy to destroy President Trump with their orchestration known as Russiagate.

The violence that the US government has committed against humanity since the Clinton regime attacked Serbia was not committed by Trump deplorables. The violence that has destroyed in whole or part eight countries, murdering, maiming, and displacing millions of peoples, was committed by the Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes, their secretaries of state such as Hillary Clinton, their national security advisers, their military and security establishments, both parties in Congress. The murder of entire countries was endorsed by the presstitute media and the heads of state of Washington’s European, Canadian, Australian, and Japanese vassals. Trump and his deplorables have a long way to go to match this record of violence.

Whether she understands it or not, Ms. Huang with her letter is shifting the violence from where it belongs to where it does not. The consequence will be to increase violence and human rights violations.

The most dangerous source of violence that we face is nuclear Armageddon resulting from the neoconservative quest for US hegemony. Since the Clinton regime every US government has broken tension-easing agreements that previous administrations had achieved with Moscow. During the Obama regime the gratuitous aggressions and false accusations against Russia became extreme.

Why doesn’t Amnesty International address the reckless and irresponsible acts of the US government that are violating the rights of people in numerous countries and pushing the world into nuclear war? Instead, there have been times when Amnesty International aligns with Washington’s propaganda against Washington’s victims.

By jumping on the military/security complex gets Trump movement, human rights and environmental organizations have increased the likelihood that rights and environment will be lost to war.

There can be no doubt that Trump is undoing past environmental protections and opening the environment and wildlife to more destruction. However, the worst destruction comes from war, especially nuclear war.

Would things be different if the liberal/progressive/left had rallied to Trump’s support in reducing tensions with Russia, in normalizing the hostile relations that Obama had established with Moscow? Would the support of the liberal/progressive/left have helped Trump resist the pressures from the neoconservative warmongers? In exchange for support for his principal goal, would Trump have mitigated industry’s attacks on the environment and vetoed the renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that violates human rights?

We will never know, because the liberal/progressive/left could not see beyond the end ot its nose to comprehend what it means for the environment and for human rights for nuclear powers to be locked into mutual suspicion.

Thanks to the failure of the liberal/progressive/left and to the presstitute media to understand the stakes, the military/security complex has been successful in pushing Trump off his agenda. The damage that a mining company and offshore drilling can do to the environment is large, but it pales in comparison to the damage from nuclear weapons.

Submitters Website:

Submitters Bio:

Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente’s Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His books, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available here, and How America Was Lost, can be ordered here. His latest book, The Neoconservative ThreatTo International Order: Washington’s Perilous War For Hegemony, can be ordered here.



About eslkevin

I am a peace educator who has taken time to teach and work in countries such as the USA, Germany, Japan, Nicaragua, Mexico, the UAE, Kuwait, Oman over the past 4 decades.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.